I suspect the worse that would have happened immediately would have been an emergency relocation to Canada by the government if a Nazi invasion had taken place and been successful. That neatly sums it up. By the time lead-lease had produced any major change in the situation the decision to invade Russia and thus lose the war had already been taken in Berlin. Historically 21st Army Group had the English Channel/North Sea on one flank and the Americans on the other flank. And now they are saying that we had plenty of everything on our own.". Kennedy says that most historians agree that American entry into World War I tipped the scales against Germany and that without the participation of the United States the Allies would have lost, defined as having to make a compromise peace with the Germans largely on German terms. Things werent going well for the. While the Japanese did draw away British resources to the Far East, which included the Commonwealth forces of Australia and New Zealand, as well as the Indian Army, this really didn't benefit the Germans all that much. At these loss rates, the Red Army was still far more dependent upon Lend-Lease armour than it was willing to admit, and it did not have enough excess production to fully outfit its best units with T-34s until mid-1943. Even with everything noted above, Germany and its European partners could have still won the war were it not for Germany's declaration of war on the United States on December 11, 1941. The lack of lend-lease would have made life very difficult, and it would have taken much longer to assemble any kind of invasion force - possibly allowing Germany to develop atomic weapons and extended range missiles. In addition, almost half of all the rails used by the Soviet Union during the war came through Lend-Lease. It had been foreseen in 1916 that if the United States went to war, the Allies military effort against Germany would be upheld by U.S. supplies and by enormous extensions of credit. Would the US have entered WWII on the Nazi front if Germany got the UK to surrender after the blitzkrieg? As history tells us, Operation Overlord was a success as Allied forces managed to breach Hitlers Only Occupy the Polish Corridor, Not All of Western Poland. on politics, society, foreign policy, philosophy and tech. After Hitler became increasingly sidelined, this became a blunt policy, as you would see from the personal stories of relatives of (German) Quorans in regard to the late stages of war, and how many of them were ferried back to West so that they could surrender to the other Allies. At the same time, Italian dictator Benito Mussolini could have made demands for France and Britain to honor their promises to Italy for more Yugoslav territory in return for entering World War One on the side of the Allies. Neither the Allied Powers (France, Britain, Russia, Italy, Japan, and several smaller states) nor the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria) would have gained everything they wanted from a negotiated settlement. In regard to combat balance, we see many disasters in Western Front as well. Could the Allies have won without US ww1? Then there is the fact that Germany lacked the winter clothing for its Army during that first terrible Soviet winter. without the US sending in Millions of troops and supplying material I dont see an Entente victory. This included such small arms as the MG34, MG42 and the world's first "assault rifle," the StG44. American air superiority A Japanese attack on the Soviet Union, on the other hand, would have put Josef Stalin in the very difficult situation of also fighting a two-front war. This proved crucial in the Blitzkrieg against the Low Countries and France. Overall, the Western Allies were responsible only for a small fraction of the losses sustained by German infantry and armor between 1941 and 1943 (around 10 percent); however, their contribution in the destruction and occupation of the Luftwaffe was overwhelming. Keeping America out of the war should have been the goal for Germany. Germany's defeat came about from a number of much larger factors. By the onset of the great depression, Americans no longer cared to talk or think about the great war; even veterans felt that way. Without landing craft another example of wrong equipment and lacking control of the skies of Great Britain, an invasion by Germany was simply impossible. The entry of the United States was the turning point of the war, because it made the eventual defeat of Germany possible. This isnt to say the U.S. won the war on its own. The problem is the flanks. The allies won WW2 and the allies won the cold war. metal splinters inside the tank) when the tank was hit by non-penetrating rounds.137 Although designed as infantry support tanks and employed in that role by the Red Army, the 2-pounder gun did not have an HE round, which reduced the value of the tanks in that role. Britain, and probably France as well, would have likely pressured the Poles to accept such a reasonable compromise proposal and informed them they would not support Poland militarily if Poland rejected it just as they told Czech leaders after Munich. British-built armour plate also had a much higher nickel content 3 per cent versus 1 per cent for Russian-made steel which reduced the risk of armour spalling (i.e. And Soviet forces would have been much more poorly coordinated with a constant lack of radio equipment. U.S. Neutrality The United States remained neutral at the beginning of the war. Many of the arguments are colored either by existing national or social biases, and many of them are colored by propaganda be it World War II propaganda, be it Cold War propaganda. If Zhukov was able to destroy a veteran Japanese army in ~4 months in Khalkin Gol, they could easily hold them off with less divisions and resources. If you would like to understand what kind of bloodbath happened in Italy because of Churchills political plays, here: It didnt end there. Yes Lend-Lease was vital, In order to ensure that tank production goals were met by Soviet industry, Stalin made Vyacheslav Malyshev, an engineer who had proven himself in the expansion of Soviet heavy industry in the 1930s, head of the Peoples Commissariat of the Tank Industry of the USSR (NKTP) that was established on 11 September. Would The Allies Have Won Ww2 Without Russia? Won For asking casual questions about History. However, even with lack of US presence in the war, Germany would still need to keep some presence in this Atlantic Wall of theirs. The captain, two crew members, and six passengers had left earlier in an ill-fated effort to get help. The German Army was practically at the gates of Moscow in late 1941. WW2 He believed that a war with Russia would lead to the downfall of both empires.. Sure but this not what the OP specified so the answer remains yes the Allies could win without direct US involvement or even with the pre Lend-Lease levels of support if it happens early in the war. This gave Poland the footing it needed to refuse all of Hitlers subsequent attempts to negotiate the return of this Polish occupied German city. The same applies to their contribution in forcing the Germans to leave most heavy artillery in the Reich as anti-aircraft weapons, preventing them from being used as anti-tank weapons in the East. These territorial claims included the entire Istrian peninsula and northern Dalmatian coast and adjacent islands in the Adriatic Sea as well as a protectorate over Albania, all of which ended up being annexedfollowing the Axis invasion of Yugoslavia in April 1941. The 76-year-old's private plane is expected to land at Aberdeen Additionally, without bombing, and the need to maintain a large enough army to fight on several fronts, there would have been less need to use forced labor in the factories, thus boosting production. Thus, Hitler could have achieved the last of his territorial objectives without war, with the exception of those pertaining to the Soviet Union. During the Spanish Civil War, which has been called a dress rehearsal for the Second World War, Germany's Luftwaffe perfected its strategy of using dive bombers and close-support attack aircraft. Their aircraft carriers are mostly converted from civilian ships during interwar years. Russian Federation Soviet Union When we look at the situation in Western Front, we see Germans not sweating much to stall Allies after Normandy. But right before the Normandy landings, this region (France, Atlantic Wall) was still considered a holiday region by German army, and sons, relatives of notables, party figures were sent there rather than Eastern Front as one old BBC documentary so bluntly put it. By June 1944, Soviets were already positioning for their drive into Germany, as can be seen from the state of Eastern Front at that date: Just a month after Normandy, Red Army was already pushing into Germany. Defeat never came down to one battle or one campaign. WW2 Nikita Khrushchev offered the same opinion. Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers and websites. Less than six months later, France and Britain were dragged into the war. He motivated factory managers by reminding them what happened to people who didnt meet Stalins quotas and pointedly said, I am responsible for the tanks with my head. While Soviet efforts to mobilize labour and industrial resources were prodigious, it should be noted that the rapid expansion of Soviet tank production would have been handicapped without the delivery of Lend-Lease raw materials and machine tools to replace equipment lost in the hasty evacuations. Without U.S. entry, there would have no Versailles Treaty, termed a diktat by Hitler, who used it to arouse Germany against the Weimar Republic and Wilsons League of Nations. won World War II I already posted a similar thread about US involvement in WWI. Rommel had scarce manpower and supplies at his disposal, yet he made good use of what he had, and Britain succeeded in stopping Germans only with amassing of massive resources and manpower in firstFirst Battle of El Alamein. The lessons from the First World War should have been enough for Hitler and the German high command, but the decision to invade the Soviet Union in June 1941 when the British were still undefeated was a colossal blunder. Recall that 75% of the German soldiers killed in WWII were killed by the WebIn the summer of 1945, Japans war leaders knew they were not going to win World War II. Dont Violate the Munich Pact by Occupying the Czech provinces of Bohemia and Moravia. And the Russian winter. It had Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria on its side. What would have happened if the United States didnt enter WWII? Could we really have set up the production of our tanks without American steel? However, I have serious doubts that the Germans would have been able to win the war had the USA stay neutral. Faced with these realities and incensed by the attack on Pearl Harbor, everyday Americans enthusiastically supported the war effort. Lend Lease for USSR was important in non-combat equipment radios, trucks and similar. One look at the map of southern Europe easily tells even people with non-military education that there is nothing soft about that location at all Italy is hilly, rough terrain, and where Italy connects to Europe is even worse impassable Alps totally clog the north, and beyond Alps there are many more difficult obstacles like Black Forest, or Yugoslavian hilly countryside. Hypothetical Axis victory in World War II - Wikipedia Quora - A place to share knowledge and better understand the world Allies couldnt have won WW2 without full US support Allies could have won WW2 with US material aid but without US manpower Results are only viewable after voting. Germany had to deal with resistance and partisan efforts, and as the tide of war turned its "allies" left the fight. WebRelatives and friends have buried children and others killed in a Russian missile attack on the central Ukrainian city of Uman. WebIn 1941-2 we started to lose shipping to U boats faster than we could build them so we would eventually have brought to starvation without the US Liberty ships. By improving the balance of overall resources it brought about a ceteris paribus increase in the payoff to patriotic citizens. Normandy and the Bocage around it could be considered bloody battles, with Allies moving inch by inch. The Lend-Lease act was enacted in March 1941 and authorized the United States to provide weapons, provisions, and raw materials to strategically important countries fighting Germany and Japan -- primarily, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and China. BBC - History - World Wars: World War Two: How the Allies Won Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. By the same token, the extraordinary pitch of mobilization achieved by the Soviet Union in 1942 and early 1943 was not sustainable. What would have happened if the Allies lost ww1? WebIf the US continued to send supplies to the Allies, then the Allies probably win, nothing else appearing. Sorry Soviet and British Nationalists: the USA economic, industrial and operational/tactical contributions were key: You know, that's the crux of the problem in all these discussions: practically. Its merely that their Prime Minister is balking, Stimson wrote in his diary. Germany's defeat came about from a number of much larger factors. American and Soviet pilots pose in front of a Bell P-39 Airacobra, supplied to the Soviet Union under the Lend-Lease program. The loss of the Ukraine and other occupied areas. World War II And not surprisingly, not only the few German forces which took over Italys defense from Italian armies defended all of Italy easily and a lot of lives were lost in hilly Italian countryside, but also even at the end of the war the forces in Italy were not able to move out of soft underbelly of Axis towards French hinterland, leave aside Germany. "During World War II, only the supplies brought in by Lend-Lease prevented the paralysis of rail transport in the Soviet Union.". 3 US as the major part of landings in Northern Africa, Italy and Europeis an important bit. Stalin was of the same opinion but naturally did not admit it publicly. By doing so it practically ensured defeat.